9731L • Evidence-Based Pain Management: Interventions, Approaches, and Best Practices

Table of Contents

9731L • Evidence-Based Pain Management: Interventions, Approaches, and Best Practices

How to Receive Credit

Course Overview

Audience

Accreditations & Approvals

Designations of Credit

Individual State Behavioral Health Approvals

Course Objective

Learning Objectives

Faculty

Faculty Disclosure

Division Planners

Division Planners Disclosure

Director of Development and Academic Affairs

Director Disclosure Statement

About the Sponsor

Disclosure Statement

Implicit Bias in Health Care

1. INTRODUCTION

2. WEBINAR

3. WORKBOOK

Works Cited

9731L • Evidence-Based Pain Management: Interventions, Approaches, and Best Practices

Lori Schleck, DPT, APTA

www.netce.com

Copyright © 2026 NetCE, All rights reserved.

This live event takes place Thursday, February 5, 6 pm-8 pm EST (3 pm-5 pm PST).

This comprehensive course explores contemporary approaches to pain management, emphasizing evidence-based interventions and best practices across healthcare disciplines. Led by Dr. Lorie Schleck, DPT, an APTA clinical specialist in geriatrics, this course provides healthcare professionals with a thorough understanding of pain mechanisms, assessment strategies, and modern treatment approaches.

9731L • Evidence-Based Pain Management: Interventions, Approaches, and Best Practices

Education Category. Webinars

Release Date. 01/01/2026

Expiration Date. 02/14/2026

How to Receive Credit

To complete this course for continuing education credit please go to http://www.netce.com/course/3319 in your browser.

For assistance with receiving continuing education credit, please contact us at help@netce.com.

Course Overview

This live event takes place Thursday, February 5, 6 pm-8 pm EST (3 pm-5 pm PST).

This comprehensive course explores contemporary approaches to pain management, emphasizing evidence-based interventions and best practices across healthcare disciplines. Led by Dr. Lorie Schleck, DPT, an APTA clinical specialist in geriatrics, this course provides healthcare professionals with a thorough understanding of pain mechanisms, assessment strategies, and modern treatment approaches.

Audience

This live webinar is designed for mental and behavioral health professionals who would benefit from enhanced knowledge and skills related to evidence-based approaches to pain management.

Accreditations & Approvals

NetCE has been approved by NBCC as an Approved Continuing Education Provider, ACEP No. 6361. Programs that do not qualify for NBCC credit are clearly identified. NetCE is solely responsible for all aspects of the programs. As a Jointly Accredited Organization, NetCE is approved to offer social work continuing education by the Association of Social Work Boards (ASWB) Approved Continuing Education (ACE) program. Organizations, not individual courses, are approved under this program. Regulatory boards are the final authority on courses accepted for continuing education credit. Continuing Education (CE) credits for psychologists are provided through the co-sponsorship of the American Psychological Association (APA) Office of Continuing Education in Psychology (CEP). The APA CEP Office maintains responsibility for the content of the programs. NetCE is accredited by the International Accreditors for Continuing Education and Training (IACET). NetCE complies with the ANSI/IACET Standard, which is recognized internationally as a standard of excellence in instructional practices. As a result of this accreditation, NetCE is authorized to issue the IACET CEU. NetCE is recognized by the New York State Education Department's State Board for Mental Health Practitioners as an approved provider of continuing education for licensed mental health counselors #MHC-0021. This course is considered live online by the New York State Board of Mental Health Counseling. NetCE is recognized by the New York State Education Department's State Board for Social Work as an approved provider of continuing education for licensed social workers #SW-0033. This course is considered live online, as defined by the New York State Board for Social Work. Materials that are included in this course may include interventions and modalities that are beyond the authorized practice of licensed master social work and licensed clinical social work in New York. As a licensed professional, you are responsible for reviewing the scope of practice, including activities that are defined in law as beyond the boundaries of practice for an LMSW and LCSW. A licensee who practices beyond the authorized scope of practice could be charged with unprofessional conduct under the Education Law and Regents Rules. NetCE is recognized by the New York State Education Department's State Board for Mental Health Practitioners as an approved provider of continuing education for licensed marriage and family therapists. #MFT-0015. This course is considered live online by the New York State Board of Marriage and Family Therapy. NetCE is recognized by the New York State Education Department's State Board for Psychology as an approved provider of continuing education for licensed psychologists #PSY-0240. This course is considered live online by the New York State Board for Psychology.

Designations of Credit

NetCE designates this live event activity for 2 continuing education clock hours. NetCE designates this live event continuing education activity for 2 NBCC clock hour(s). Social workers participating in this intermediate to advanced course will receive 2 Clinical continuing education clock hours. NetCE is authorized by IACET to offer 0.2 CEU(s) for this program. NetCE designates this live continuing education activity for 2 credit(s).

Individual State Behavioral Health Approvals

In addition to states that accept ASWB, NetCE is approved as a provider of continuing education by the following state boards: Alabama State Board of Social Work Examiners, Provider #0515; Florida Board of Clinical Social Work, Marriage and Family Therapy and Mental Health Counseling, CE Broker Provider #50-2405; Illinois Division of Professional Regulation for Social Workers, License #159.001094; Illinois Division of Professional Regulation for Licensed Professional and Clinical Counselors, License #197.000185; Illinois Division of Professional Regulation for Marriage and Family Therapists, License #168.000190;

Course Objective

Current approaches to pain management are often inadequate, with providers reporting frustration, burnout, and difficulties in patient relationships when treating chronic pain. The purpose of this course is to provide clinicians with a clear understanding of the biopsychosocial model of pain and skills to appropriately identify psychological factors affecting pain outcomes, ultimately allowing them to implement evidence-based interventions that address cognitive, emotional, and social dimensions of pain experience.

Learning Objectives

Upon completion of this course, you should be able to:

1. Provide psychoeducation to clients on trauma-informed care.

2. Guide clients toward eliciting desired change.

3. Utilize trauma-informed interventions in daily counseling practice.

4. Analyze trauma-informed interventions for managing vicarious trauma.

5. Utilize appropriate cognitive-behavioral strategies and coping skills in patient care.

Faculty

Lori Schleck, DPT, APTA, has taught numerous continuing education courses on orthopedic topics. Her DPT is from Evidence in Motion Health Institutes, which focuses on evidence-based research and manual therapy competencies. She is an APTA Clinical Specialist in Geriatrics. Her teaching style is engaging, practical, and evidence focused.

Faculty Disclosure

Contributing faculty, Lori Schleck, DPT, APTA, has disclosed no relevant financial relationship with any product manufacturer or service provider mentioned.

Division Planners

Candace Pierce, DNP, RN, CNE, COI

Kimberly Byrd, EdD, PMSW

Scott Deatherage, PhD

Leyna Antonucci, PT, DPT

Jessica Restivo, MS, OTR/L, NTMTC

Verlyn Evans, EdD, CCC/SLP

Nicholas Bertoni, MD

John Makopoulos, MD

Division Planners Disclosure

The division planners have disclosed no relevant financial relationship with any product manufacturer or service provider mentioned.

Director of Development and Academic Affairs

Sarah Campbell

Director Disclosure Statement

The Director of Development and Academic Affairs has disclosed no relevant financial relationship with any product manufacturer or service provider mentioned.

About the Sponsor

The purpose of NetCE is to provide challenging curricula to assist healthcare professionals to raise their levels of expertise while fulfilling their continuing education requirements, thereby improving the quality of healthcare.

Our contributing faculty members have taken care to ensure that the information and recommendations are accurate and compatible with the standards generally accepted at the time of publication. The publisher disclaims any liability, loss or damage incurred as a consequence, directly or indirectly, of the use and application of any of the contents. Participants are cautioned about the potential risk of using limited knowledge when integrating new techniques into practice.

Disclosure Statement

It is the policy of NetCE not to accept commercial support. Furthermore, commercial interests are prohibited from distributing or providing access to this activity to learners.

Implicit Bias in Health Care

The role of implicit biases on healthcare outcomes has become a concern, as there is some evidence that implicit biases contribute to health disparities, professionals' attitudes toward and interactions with patients, quality of care, diagnoses, and treatment decisions. This may produce differences in help-seeking, diagnoses, and ultimately treatments and interventions. Implicit biases may also unwittingly produce professional behaviors, attitudes, and interactions that reduce patients' trust and comfort with their provider, leading to earlier termination of visits and/or reduced adherence and follow-up. Disadvantaged groups are marginalized in the healthcare system and vulnerable on multiple levels; health professionals' implicit biases can further exacerbate these existing disadvantages.

Interventions or strategies designed to reduce implicit bias may be categorized as change-based or control-based. Change-based interventions focus on reducing or changing cognitive associations underlying implicit biases. These interventions might include challenging stereotypes. Conversely, control-based interventions involve reducing the effects of the implicit bias on the individual's behaviors. These strategies include increasing awareness of biased thoughts and responses. The two types of interventions are not mutually exclusive and may be used synergistically.

1. INTRODUCTION

This comprehensive course explores contemporary approaches to pain management, emphasizing evidence-based interventions and best practices across healthcare disciplines. Key topics include:

- Current pain models and the transition from biomedical to biopsychosocial approaches

- Comprehensive pain assessment techniques and identification of red/yellow flags

- Psychological factors affecting pain, including catastrophizing, attention, and coping strategies

- Social and emotional influences on pain perception and management

- Evidence-based interventions, including cognitive-behavioral therapy, exercise prescription and physical activity guidelines, and physical modalities

2. WEBINAR

To see this media go to http://www.NetCE.com/activities/ using a browser that supports Adobe Flash.

3. WORKBOOK

The workbook discussed in this webinar is available here.

Works Cited

1. Asefi Rad, A., & Wippert, P. M. (2024). Insights into pain distraction and the impact of pain catastrophizing on pain perception during different types of distraction tasks. Frontiers in Pain Research, 5, Article 1266974.

2. Bourassa, M., Kolb, W. H., Barrett, D., & Wassinger, C. (2023). Guideline adherent screening and referral: Do third year doctor of physical therapy students identify red and yellow flags within descriptive patient cases? A United States based survey study. Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy, 31(4), 253-260.

3. Burston, J. J., Valdes, A. M., Woodhams, S. G., Mapp, P. I., Stocks, J., Watson, D. J. G., Gowler, P. R. W., Xu, L., Sagar, D. R., Fernandes, G., Frowd, N., Marshall, L., Zhang, W., Doherty, M., Walsh, D. A., & Chapman, V. (2019). The impact of anxiety on chronic musculoskeletal pain and the role of astrocyte activation. Pain, 160(3), 658-669.

4. de la Barra Ortiz, H. A., Avila, M. A., Miranda, L. G., & Liebano, R. E. (2023). Effect of high-intensity laser therapy in patients with non-specific chronic neck pain: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials, 24(1), Article 563.

5. De La Rosa, J. S., Brady, B. R., Ibrahim, M. M., Herder, K. E., Wallace, J. S., Padilla, A. R., & Vanderah, T. W. (2024). Co-occurrence of chronic pain and anxiety/depression symptoms in U.S. adults: Prevalence, functional impacts, and opportunities. Pain, 165(3), 666-673.

6. Fjeld, M. K., Årnes, A. P., Engdahl, B., Morseth, B., Hopstock, L. A., Horsch, A., Stubhaug, A., Strand, B. H., Nielsen, C. S., & Steingrímsdóttir, Ó. A. (2023). Consistent pattern between physical activity measures and chronic pain levels: The Tromsø Study 2015 to 2016. Pain, 164(4), 838-847.

7. Hawk, C., Whalen, W., Farabaugh, R. J., Daniels, C. J., Minkalis, A. L., Taylor, D. N., Anderson, D., Anderson, K., Crivelli, L. S., Cark, M., Barlow, E., Paris, D., Sarnat, R., & Weeks, J. (2020). Best practices for chiropractic management of patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain: A clinical practice guideline. Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 26(10), 884-901.

8. Hsu, J. R., Mir, H., Wally, M. K., Seymour, R. B., & Orthopaedic Trauma Association Musculoskeletal Pain Task Force. (2019). Clinical practice guidelines for pain management in acute musculoskeletal injury. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 33(5), e158-e182.

9. Kardash, L., Wall, C. L., Flack, M., & Searle, A. (2024). The role of pain self-efficacy and pain catastrophising in the relationship between chronic pain and depression: A moderated mediation model. PLOS ONE, 19(5), Article e0303775.

10. Khera, T., & Rangasamy, V. (2021). Cognition and pain: A review. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 673962.

11. Kishner, S. (2022). Pain assessment: Practice essentials, overview, technique. Medscape. https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1948069-overview

12. Landmark, L., Sunde, H. F., Fors, E. A., Kennair, L. E. O., Sayadian, A., Backelin, C., & Reme, S. E. (2024). Associations between pain intensity, psychosocial factors, and pain-related disability in 4285 patients with chronic pain. Scientific Reports, 14(1).

13. Lemmon, R., & Hampton, A. (2018). Nonpharmacologic treatment of chronic pain: What works? Journal of Family Practice, 67(8), 474-483.

14. Levis, B., Sun, Y., He, C., Wu, Y., Krishnan, A., Bhandari, P. M., Neupane, D., Imran, M., Brehaut, E., Negeri, Z., Fischer, F. H., Benedetti, A., Thombs, B. D., & Depression Screening Data (DEPRESSD) PHQ Collaboration. (2020). Accuracy of the PHQ-2 alone and in combination with the PHQ-9 for screening to detect major depression: Systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA, 323(22), 2290-2300.

15. Lim, M., O'Grady, C., Cane, D., Goyal, A., Lynch, M., Beyea, S., & Hashmi, J. A. (2020). Threat prediction from schemas as a source of bias in pain perception. Journal of Neuroscience, 40(7), 1538-1548.

16. Louw, A. (2018). Pain neuroscience education: Teaching people about pain. Orthopedic Physical Therapy Products.

17. Maestre-Cascales, C., Castillo-Paredes, A., Romero-Parra, N., Adsuar, J. C., & Carlos-Vivas, J. (2022). Gradual strength training improves sleep quality, physical function and pain in women with fibromyalgia. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(23), Article 15662.

18. Matthias, M. S., Parpart, A. L., Nyland, K. A., Huffman, M. A., Stubbs, D. L., Sargent, C., Bair, M. J. (2010). The patient-provider relationship in chronic pain care: Providers’ perspectives. Pain Medicine, 11(11), 1688-1697. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-4637.2010.00980.x

19. Meints, S. M., Edwards, R. R. (2018). Evaluating psychosocial contributions to chronic pain outcomes. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry, 87(Pt B), 168-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2018.01.017

20. Pardos-Gascón, E. M., Narambuena, L., Leal-Costa, C., van-der Hofstadt-Román, C. J. (2021). Differential efficacy between cognitive-behavioral therapy and mindfulness-based therapies for chronic pain: Systematic review. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 21(1), Article 100197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijchp.2020.08.001

21. Physiopedia. The Flag System. (2023, November 15). https://www.physio-pedia.com/index.php?title=The_Flag_Systemoldid=344671

22. Polaski, A. M., Phelps, A. L., Kostek, M. C., Szucs, K. A., Kolber, B. J. (2019). Exercise-induced hypoalgesia: A meta-analysis of exercise dosing for the treatment of chronic pain. PLOS ONE, 14(1), Article e0210418. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210418

23. Pontes-Silva, A., Dibai-Filho, A. V., de Melo, T. S., Santos, L. M., de Souza, M. C., DeSantana, J. M., Avila, M. A. (2023). Effects of progressive intensity resistance training on the impact of fibromyalgia: Protocol for a blinded randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 24(1), Article 816. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06952-3

24. Quartana, P. J., Campbell, C. M., Edwards, R. R. (2009). Pain catastrophizing: A critical review. Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics, 9(5), 745-758. https://doi.org/10.1586/ern.09.34

25. Rampazo, É. P., Júnior, M. A. L., Corrêa, J. B., de Oliveira, N. T. B., Santos, I. D., Liebano, R. E., Costa, L. O. P. (2023). Effectiveness of interferential current in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy, 27(5), Article 100549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjpt.2023.100549

26. Shi, Y., Wu, W. (2023). Multimodal non-invasive non-pharmacological therapies for chronic pain: Mechanisms and progress. BMC Medicine, 21(1), Article 372. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-023-03076-2

27. Simic, K., Savic, B., Knezevic, N. N. (2024). Pain catastrophizing: How far have we come? Neurological International, 16(3), 483-501. https://doi.org/10.3390/neurolint16030036

28. Stearns, Z. R., Carvalho, M. L., Beneciuk, J. M., Lentz, T. A. (2021). Screening for yellow flags in orthopaedic physical therapy: A clinical framework. Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy, 51(9), 459-469. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2021.10570

29. Sturgeon, J. A., Zautra, A. J. (2016). Social pain and physical pain: Shared paths to resilience. Pain Management, 6(1), 63-74. https://doi.org/10.2217/pmt.15.56

30. Vader, K., Patel, R., Doulas, T., Miller, J. (2020). Promoting participation in physical activity and exercise among people living with chronic pain: A qualitative study of strategies used by people with pain and their recommendations for health care providers. Pain Medicine, 21(3), 625-635. https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnz246

31. West Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust. (2021). Chronic pain self-management: Pacing and goal setting. https://www.wsh.nhs.uk/CMS-Documents/Patient-leaflets/PainService/6290-1c-Chronic-pain-self-management-pacing-and-goal-setting.pdf

32. Wu, M., Luan, L., Pranata, A., Witchalls, J., Adams, R., Bousie, J., Han, J. (2022). Is high intensity laser therapy more effective than other physical therapy modalities for treating knee osteoarthritis? A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Frontiers in Medicine, 9, Article 956188. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.956188

33. Zah, V., Brookfield, R. B., Imro, M., Tatovic, S., Pelivanovic, J., Vukicevic, D. (2019). Healthcare costs and resource utilization in chronic pain patients treated with extended-release formulations of tapentadol, oxycodone, or morphine stratified by type of pain: A retrospective claims analysis, 2012-2016. Journal of Pain Research, 12, 3037-3048. https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S222617