66090 • Mental Health Interventions for End-of-Life Care

Table of Contents

66090 • Mental Health Interventions for End-of-Life Care

How to Receive Credit

Course Overview

Audience

Accreditations & Approvals

Designations of Credit

Course Objective

Learning Objectives

Faculty

Faculty Disclosure

Division Planner

Division Planner Disclosure

Director of Development and Academic Affairs

Director Disclosure Statement

About the Sponsor

Disclosure Statement

Implicit Bias in Health Care

1. INTRODUCTION

2. DIGNITY MODEL/DIGNITY THERAPY

LIFE REVIEW

NARRATIVE APPROACH

3. TERROR MANAGEMENT THEORY

4. COGNITIVE-BEHAVIORAL THERAPY

5. MEANING-CENTERED PSYCHOTHERAPY

6. COMPASSION-BASED THERAPY

BEING PRESENT

7. OTHER INTERVENTIONS

MINDFULNESS

SPIRITUAL CARE

ART AND MUSIC THERAPY

Works Cited

Evidence-Based Practice Recommendations Citations

66090 • Mental Health Interventions for End-of-Life Care

Lisa Hutchison, LMHC

www.netce.com

Copyright © 2026 NetCE, All rights reserved.

Patients facing life-limiting illness often experience psychological, emotional, existential, and spiritual distress that can significantly affect quality of life. As palliative and end-of-life care have evolved, a variety of evidence-based mental health interventions have emerged to help patients find meaning, preserve dignity, cope with suffering, and navigate the challenges associated with serious illness and dying. This course reviews the theoretical foundations, therapeutic goals, and clinical applications of major psychosocial interventions used in end-of-life care, including dignity therapy, life review, narrative approaches, terror management theory, cognitive-behavioral interventions, meaning-centered psychotherapy, compassion-based therapy, mindfulness, spiritual care, and expressive therapies. Participants will gain an understanding of how these interventions can be used individually and collaboratively to address the diverse psychological, existential, and spiritual needs of patients and families while supporting person-centered, compassionate end-of-life care.

66090 • Mental Health Interventions for End-of-Life Care

Education Category. Psychiatric / Mental Health

Release Date. 09/01/2026

Expiration Date. 08/31/2029

How to Receive Credit

To complete this course for continuing education credit please go to http://www.netce.com/course/3629 in your browser.

For assistance with receiving continuing education credit, please contact us at help@netce.com.

Course Overview

Patients facing life-limiting illness often experience psychological, emotional, existential, and spiritual distress that can significantly affect quality of life. As palliative and end-of-life care have evolved, a variety of evidence-based mental health interventions have emerged to help patients find meaning, preserve dignity, cope with suffering, and navigate the challenges associated with serious illness and dying. This course reviews the theoretical foundations, therapeutic goals, and clinical applications of major psychosocial interventions used in end-of-life care, including dignity therapy, life review, narrative approaches, terror management theory, cognitive-behavioral interventions, meaning-centered psychotherapy, compassion-based therapy, mindfulness, spiritual care, and expressive therapies. Participants will gain an understanding of how these interventions can be used individually and collaboratively to address the diverse psychological, existential, and spiritual needs of patients and families while supporting person-centered, compassionate end-of-life care.

Audience

This course is designed for psychologists involved in providing care to patients at the end of life.

Accreditations & Approvals

Continuing Education (CE) credits for psychologists are provided through the co-sponsorship of the American Psychological Association (APA) Office of Continuing Education in Psychology (CEP). The APA CEP Office maintains responsibility for the content of the programs. NetCE is recognized by the New York State Education Department's State Board for Psychology as an approved provider of continuing education for licensed psychologists #PSY-0240. This course is considered self-study by the New York State Board for Psychology.

Designations of Credit

NetCE designates this continuing education activity for 1 credit(s).

Course Objective

The purpose of this course is to provide psychologists with the knowledge and strategies necessary to support the mental health needs of patients at the end-of-life care.

Learning Objectives

Upon completion of this course, you should be able to:

1. Describe the purpose and key characteristics of dignity therapy, life review, and narrative approaches in end-of-life care.

2. Compare theoretical and psychotherapeutic frameworks used to address existential distress in patients with life-limiting illness, including terror management theory, cognitive-behavioral therapy, meaning-centered psychotherapy, and compassion-based therapy.

3. Identify complementary interventions that support quality of life and psychosocial well-being at the end of life, including mindfulness, spiritual care, art therapy, and music therapy.

Faculty

Lisa Hutchison, LMHC, has more than 20 years of experience providing individual and group counseling with adults. She specifically focuses on teaching assertiveness, stress management, and boundary setting for empathic helpers. Ms. Hutchison graduated from the University of Massachusetts, Boston, with a Master’s degree in education for mental health counseling.

Faculty Disclosure

Contributing faculty, Lisa Hutchison, LMHC, has disclosed no relevant financial relationship with any product manufacturer or service provider mentioned.

Division Planner

Margaret Donohue, PhD

Division Planner Disclosure

The division planner has disclosed no relevant financial relationship with any product manufacturer or service provider mentioned.

Director of Development and Academic Affairs

Sarah Campbell

Director Disclosure Statement

The Director of Development and Academic Affairs has disclosed no relevant financial relationship with any product manufacturer or service provider mentioned.

About the Sponsor

The purpose of NetCE is to provide challenging curricula to assist healthcare professionals to raise their levels of expertise while fulfilling their continuing education requirements, thereby improving the quality of healthcare.

Our contributing faculty members have taken care to ensure that the information and recommendations are accurate and compatible with the standards generally accepted at the time of publication. The publisher disclaims any liability, loss or damage incurred as a consequence, directly or indirectly, of the use and application of any of the contents. Participants are cautioned about the potential risk of using limited knowledge when integrating new techniques into practice.

Disclosure Statement

It is the policy of NetCE not to accept commercial support. Furthermore, commercial interests are prohibited from distributing or providing access to this activity to learners.

Implicit Bias in Health Care

The role of implicit biases on healthcare outcomes has become a concern, as there is some evidence that implicit biases contribute to health disparities, professionals' attitudes toward and interactions with patients, quality of care, diagnoses, and treatment decisions. This may produce differences in help-seeking, diagnoses, and ultimately treatments and interventions. Implicit biases may also unwittingly produce professional behaviors, attitudes, and interactions that reduce patients' trust and comfort with their provider, leading to earlier termination of visits and/or reduced adherence and follow-up. Disadvantaged groups are marginalized in the healthcare system and vulnerable on multiple levels; health professionals' implicit biases can further exacerbate these existing disadvantages.

Interventions or strategies designed to reduce implicit bias may be categorized as change-based or control-based. Change-based interventions focus on reducing or changing cognitive associations underlying implicit biases. These interventions might include challenging stereotypes. Conversely, control-based interventions involve reducing the effects of the implicit bias on the individual's behaviors. These strategies include increasing awareness of biased thoughts and responses. The two types of interventions are not mutually exclusive and may be used synergistically.

1. INTRODUCTION

Evidence Based Practice Recommendation

According to the National Coalition for Hospice and Palliative Care, psychological, mental health, and psychiatric treatment at the end of life may include behavioral, therapeutic, and pharmacologic interventions, as well as complementary therapies, and culturally specific practices or rituals.

https://www.nationalcoalitionhpc.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/NCHPC-NCPGuidelines_4thED_web_FINAL.pdf

Last Accessed: August 17, 2026

Level of Evidence: Expert Opinion/Consensus Statement

Shortly after Kübler-Ross began to publish her work on the states of grief, group psychotherapists began developing systematic interventions for patients who were dying. This included Irvin Yalom in the 1980s, who was heavily influenced by existential philosophy. Yalom's work formed the basis for what became supportive expressive group psychotherapy (SEGT). SEGT was originally developed to help patients with metastatic breast cancer face and adjust to their existential concerns (e.g., death, meaninglessness), express and manage disease-related emotions, and enhance relationships with family and healthcare providers. SEGT challenged the thinking that group therapy for patients with terminal illness would be demoralizing [1,2]. Over the next several decades, research in end-of-life care, patients' end-of-life needs, and the role of mental health professionals in these settings increased [1].

In the late 20th century, physician-assisted death (also referred to as medical aid in dying, physician aid in dying, physician-assisted suicide, or euthanasia) became a topic of interest as researchers sought to understand why some patients with life-limiting illness might want to hasten death [1]. Pain, depression, and physical symptoms were at first thought to be the primary motives behind the desire to hasten death, but literature in the 1990s and 2000s emphasized the psychological and existential correlates (i.e., depression, hopelessness, spiritual well-being) of physician-assisted death. This shift in emphasis led to the development of a number of psychotherapeutic interventions that focused on the psychological and spiritual needs of patients [1].

2. DIGNITY MODEL/DIGNITY THERAPY

Dignity therapy was one of the first interventions developed for use in end-of-life care [3]. This modality aims to relieve psycho-emotional and existential distress to improve the experiences of patients with life-limiting illness. It offers patients the opportunity to reflect on what is important to them and on what they might want to communicate to loved ones [4]. In dignity therapy, patients are invited to reflect on and later discuss what aspects of their life they most want recorded and remembered—often referred to as their "legacy" [5]. The sessions are audiotaped and guided by a framework of questions (provided in advance) that facilitate disclosure of the patient's thoughts, feelings, and memories. The interview is then transcribed and printed for the patient's review and editing, as desired. Once finalized, the document is given to the patient, who may (or may not) share with friends and family, as desired. In addition to providing a tangible legacy for the patient, dignity therapy helps enhance the patient's sense of meaning and purpose, thus contributing to a preservation of the patient's dignity [1].

A 2011 study revealed that the items most commonly included in legacy documents were autobiographical information, lessons learned in life, defining roles (e.g., vocations, hobbies), accomplishments, character traits, unfinished business, overcoming challenges, and guidance for others [6]. Dignity therapy has been shown to positively affect patients' sense of generativity, meaning, and acceptance near the end of life. Positive impacts on families and caregivers of dignity therapy participants provide additional support for the clinical utility of this intervention [7]. However, dignity therapy is not for every patient with terminal illness. Despite the demonstrated beneficial effects, its ability to mitigate outright distress (e.g., depression, desire for death or suicidality) has yet to be proven [8]. Acknowledged limitations of dignity therapy include having adequate time, space, and means to engage in this intervention. Dignity therapy also cannot be used with patients who are nonverbal or unconscious or with those who have severe cognitive limitations [9]. Further studies are needed to determine whether patients with specific types of terminal illnesses (e.g., oncologic, cardiac, renal, pulmonary, neurologic) or in specific age cohorts (e.g., pediatric, adult, geriatric) benefit more or less significantly in certain domains (e.g., measures of spiritual distress, autonomy, death anxiety) [9].

LIFE REVIEW

Dignity therapy incorporates the concept of life review, which is the systematic and structured process of recalling past events and memories in an effort to find meaning and achieve resolution of one's life. It is conducted over four sessions in which patients chronologically review their childhood, adolescence, adulthood, and present situation. A health or mental health professional takes notes, but no other end product is produced [10]. Life review can be useful for patients of any age at the end of life [11]. Life review is typically structured around life themes (e.g., being a parent/grandparent, first job, life's work, important turning points) [12]. The process can be either reminiscent or evaluative. It also can teach or inform others and pass on knowledge and experience to a new generation. Life review conducted for therapeutic purposes can help patients cope with loss, guilt, conflict, or defeat and find meaning in their accomplishments [12]. In Western culture, life review may subsequently be shared with family or friends. For patients of other cultures, life review may be more communal and may involve rituals that are an important part of the dying process [13]. Few studies have evaluated therapeutic life review interventions, but preliminary results are promising [10].

NARRATIVE APPROACH

Narrative practice is built on the assumption that people live multistoried lives. This perspective allows patients to shift from one life story to another to give meaning to their lives and shape their identities. A narrative approach frees the care team from the role of "expert" to the role of "helper" who facilitates patients' creation of personal stories of agency at times of life-limiting illness [14]. Narrative therapy is a practical psychotherapeutic process in which the professional and patient collaborate to deconstruct cultural and personal narratives that negatively affect the patient's sense of resources, efficacy, and identity. Together, clinician and patient discover and enrich positive, empowering, and helpful stories that originate in the patient's previous experiences [15]. Narrative therapy is patient-centered and goal-directed. Goals are to help patients improve their sense of self, separate problematic experiences away from their identity, and see themselves outside problems they may be facing. Narrative interventions can help patients and their families create new meaning of the patient's illness and end-of-life experiences [16].

3. TERROR MANAGEMENT THEORY

The concept of terror management theory was developed in 1986 and was based upon the work of Ernest Becker, a cultural anthropologist who had written about death and anxiety [17,18]. Terror management theory is the concept that people feel threatened by a deep and terrifying fear of living an insignificant life that is destined to be erased by death. People cope with the awareness of their mortality in different ways. Some will adopt a worldview that allows them to find meaning, purpose, and enduring significance; others simply avoid thinking about death altogether and instead devote themselves to leaving behind a legacy that will make them "immortal" [18,19]. While the fear of death can promote insecurity and bias or prejudice (based upon one's worldview), terror management theory helps people use their awareness of death to consciously choose to take positive steps to find meaning in their lives [18]. The awareness of mortality can motivate people to prioritize growth-oriented goals, live according to positive standards and beliefs, and foster the development of peaceful, charitable communities [20].

4. COGNITIVE-BEHAVIORAL THERAPY

The focus of traditional cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) is changing maladaptive thought patterns or perceptions that lead to mood disorders, such as anxiety and depression. But changing maladaptive thoughts to more realistic or positive ones does not always meet the needs of patients with life-limiting illness. These patients have very real fears about suffering and uncontrolled pain and other noxious symptoms, and their fears and thoughts are neither maladaptive nor unreasonable [21]. CBT adapted to end-of-life care can help patients identify "all-or-nothing" thinking and help them recognize that core parts of themselves remain unchanged [22].

Studies demonstrate that palliative care professionals have effectively applied CBT techniques to reduce mild-to-moderate anxiety or depression at the end of life and increase the patient's focus on the quality of remaining life [21,23,24]. For example, researchers incorporated elements of acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) and dialectical behavior therapy (DBT). With ACT, patients learn to stop avoiding, denying, and struggling with their emotions. They instead learn to accept their emotions (and the source), accept their private circumstances, and not allow the circumstances to prevent them from moving forward in ways that serve their chosen values [25,26]. DBT includes a strong educational component designed to provide patients with the skills to manage intense emotions [27].

5. MEANING-CENTERED PSYCHOTHERAPY

Meaning-centered group psychotherapy, based on the works of Viktor Frankl, was originally conceived as a group-based intervention for individuals with advanced cancer. Frankl's theory is existential in nature and postulates that the creation of meaning is a primary force of human motivation, even during times of great suffering [12]. The group therapy helps patients identify sources of meaning as a resource to sustain meaning, spiritual well-being, and purpose in the midst of suffering [1,12]. Meaning-centered psychotherapy was later adapted for use with individual patients [28]. The goals of meaning-centered psychotherapy are to provide support for patients to explore personal issues and feelings related to their illness; to help patients identify sources of meaning; and to help patients discover and maintain a sense of meaning in life, even as their illness progresses [1]. Randomized controlled trials conducted to date, totaling nearly 800 patients, have demonstrated support for meaning-centered psychotherapy in improving spiritual well-being and reducing psychological stress in patients at the end of life [29,30,31]. The extent to which the observed results can be attributed to the patient's changes in sense of meaning require further study [1]. Like dignity therapy, meaning-centered psychotherapy has fueled multiple adaptations to target unique clinical populations and settings (e.g., bereaved family members, caregivers) [32,33,34].

6. COMPASSION-BASED THERAPY

Compassion-based therapy is rooted in an evolutionary analysis of basic social and emotional systems that motivate humans to live in groups, form hierarchies, help and share through alliances, care for kin, respond to threats, and seek states of contentment/safeness [35]. Compassion-based therapy can be supportive to those facing end-of-life decision making. It is inextricably linked to the inherent values, needs, and expectations of patients, families, and healthcare providers. Compassion coupled with a collaborative framework sustains patient- and family-centered care in end-of-life practice settings [36].

Compassion-based therapy offers a novel, transdiagnostic approach for reducing psychopathology and increasing well-being. It changes the focus of therapy from individual thoughts or unconscious conflicts toward the development of affiliative and prosocial functioning [37]. One overview of compassion-based therapies found at least eight different interventions (e.g., compassion-focused therapy, mindful self-compassion, cognitively based compassion training), six of which have been evaluated in randomized controlled trials. Compassion-based interventions demonstrated reduced suffering and improved life satisfaction for patients [37]. A systematic review conducted to assess the effectiveness of compassion-based therapy analyzed 14 studies, including three randomized controlled studies [38]. Compassion-focused therapy was effective with depressive disorders and for people who are highly self-critical. Compassion-based therapy is most effective when used in conjunction with other types of treatment and therapy [38].

BEING PRESENT

One of the most important therapeutic and compassionate aspects a health professional can offer is their presence. Listening to and allowing patients to express their end-of-life experience is healing and can be more comforting than guidance. One study investigated how palliative care chaplains work with patients at the point when it has been decided to cease active treatment, the point at which patients risk losing hope and falling into despair [39]. The author identified four types of presence in the chaplain-patient relationship that were a result of the chaplain's "being with the patient." Each type of presence (i.e., evocative, accompanying, comforting, hopeful) represented a discernible development in the chaplain/patient relationship—a theory of chaplain as hopeful presence [39].

The effects of educating patients and families about the importance of being present was the goal of a descriptive study that included 19 critical care nurses [40]. The nurses were interviewed to understand their experiences and perceptions about caring for patients and families transitioning from aggressive life-saving care to palliative and end-of-life care [40]. The nurses prioritized educating the family, advocating for the patient, encouraging and supporting the family's presence, protecting families, and helping them create positive memories. The family's presence at the end of life also helped them to process the reality of their loved one's death and make peace with it [40].

7. OTHER INTERVENTIONS

Researchers and clinicians have developed a variety of other interventions for end-of-life care. One proposed treatment is called short-term life review (STLR). Like dignity therapy, STLR interviews the patient for the purpose of creating a legacy album, but STLR differs from dignity therapy in the substance of the interview. A single published randomized controlled trial has examined the utility of STLR, and little research has been conducted to support the STLR approach. The research that has been published has suggested increases in spiritual well-being, sense of hope, and death preparedness among patients with terminal cancer [1,41,42].

Managing cancer and living meaningfully (CALM) is a brief, structured intervention developed for patients with advanced and/or terminal cancer [1,43,44]. The focus of CALM is similar to meaning-centered psychotherapy, but it provides less emphasis on spiritual well-being and existential issues due to its longer timeframe [1]. The first large-scale randomized controlled trial of CALM reports that individuals demonstrated significantly greater improvements in depressive symptoms and overall quality of life compared to those who received usual care [45].

MINDFULNESS

Mindfulness is the practice of paying deliberate attention to experiences of the present moment with openness, curiosity, and a willingness to allow things to be as they are [46]. End-of-life care is, by its nature, rooted in mindfulness through [47]:

- The healthcare team providing steady presence and compassion to the dying patient

- Bringing one's full attention to clinical assessments and supportive interactions and acknowledging what arises during these interactions for patients, families, and clinicians

- Being attuned to the dying and their needs, remaining present with their suffering

- Being genuinely interested in the patient's/family's experiences

- Allowing the full expression of personal experiences, with no attempt to change or fix them

- Cultivating compassion and acknowledging our shared humanity

SPIRITUAL CARE

Spiritual care is considered a basic tenet of palliative care and a responsibility of the entire end-of-life care team. Patients who receive good spiritual care report greater quality of life, better coping, and greater well-being, hope, optimism, and reduction of despair at the end of life. Despite these benefits, patients and caregivers often refuse spiritual care when offered. One study that sought to understand this reluctance focused on the effect of education. The authors reported that an educational intervention, which included explaining the services of hospice chaplains and the evidence-based benefits of spiritual support, led to greater patient/caregiver acceptance of spiritual care [48]. End-of-life counselors, therapists, and social workers are uniquely positioned to work with patients to explore the variables that they and their families use as guiding principles when making difficult decisions [49]. This requires assessing the patient's spiritual, religious, and existential needs (i.e., spiritual needs) to provide appropriate interventions [50].

The specifics of how to conduct assessment are determined by individual healthcare organizations but usually consist first of obtaining a spiritual history of the patient and the patient's family. A variety of tools are available. The FICA acronym asks four questions about faith, importance/influence of beliefs, community involvement, and addressing issues of care [51]. The HOPE questions inquire about patients' sources of hope and meaning, whether they belong to an organized religion, their personal spirituality and practices, and what effect their spirituality may have on end-of-life care [52]. Reported barriers to spiritual assessment include clinician lack of time/experience, difficulty identifying patients who wish to discuss spiritual beliefs, and addressing concerns not regarded as the clinician's responsibility. Assessing and integrating patient spirituality into end-of-life care can build trust and rapport and strengthen the patient's relationship with the end-of-life care team [52]. Unaddressed spiritual issues may frustrate attempts to treat other symptoms and adversely impact the patient's quality of life [49].

ART AND MUSIC THERAPY

Art and music therapists are becoming increasingly available to palliative care teams and are advancing the diverse and unique clinical services available to effectively meet the holistic needs of patients with serious illness [53]. Art can connect with deep psychological and physical pain, allowing the patient to find expression and relief. Studies have found that expressive arts (e.g., paint, clay, textiles, drawing) help patients more effectively deal with ambivalent emotions regarding life-death issues and communicate with their families about their feelings. It helps patients articulate their end-of-life journey beyond language [54,55].

Art therapy also may be helpful in reducing burnout among end-of-life care providers by enhancing their emotional awareness, fostering meaning-making, and promoting reflection on death. One study found significant reductions in exhaustion and death anxiety in end-of-life care providers who participated in an art therapy program [56].

Music therapy incorporates music chosen by the patient in consultation with a qualified music therapist. The music is often chosen to arouse specific emotions that allow the patient to more easily access, recall, and interrogate memories, with the goal of understanding the role those memories play in the patient's current circumstances [56]. Music therapy also may be an effective adjuvant to pain management therapy [56].

Works Cited

1. Saracino RM, Rosenfeld B, Breitbart W, Cochinov HM. Psychotherapy at the end of life.Am J Bioeth. 2019;19(12):19-28.

2. Classen C, Butler LD, Koopman C, et al. Supportive-expressive group therapy and distress in patients with metastatic breast cancer: a randomized clinical intervention trial.Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2001;58(5):494-501.

3. Chochinov HM, Hack T, Hassard T, Kristjanson LJ, McClement S, Harlos M. Dignity therapy: a novel psychotherapeutic intervention for patients near the end of life.J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:5520-5525.

4. Martinez M, Arantzamendi M, Centeno C, et al. Dignity therapy, a promising intervention in palliative care. A comprehensive systematic literature review.Palliative Med. 2017;31(6):492-509.

5. Bernat JK, Helft PR, Wilhelm LR, et al. Piloting an abbreviated dignity therapy intervention using a legacy-building web portal for adults with terminal cancer: a feasibility and acceptability study.Psychooncology. 2015;24(12):1823-1825.

6. Montross L, Winters KD, Irwin SA. Dignity therapy implementation in a community-based hospice setting.J Palliative Med. 2011;14(6):729-734.

7. Vuksanovic D, Green HJ, Dyck M, Morrissey SA. Dignity therapy and life review for palliative care patients: a randomized controlled trial.J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017;53(2):162-170.

8. Chochinov HM, Kristjanson LJ, Breitbart W, et al. Effect of dignity therapy on distress and end-of-life experience in terminally ill patients: a randomised controlled trial.Lancet Oncol. 2011;12(8):753-762.

9. Rosenberg S, Dignity therapy.Am J Psychiatry. 2018;13(8):6-7.

10. Keall RM, clayton JM, Butow PN. Therapeutic life review in palliative care: a systematic review of quantitative evaluations.J Pain Symptom Manage. 2015;49(4):747-761.

11. Jenko M, Gonzalez L, Seymoure MJ. Life review with the terminally ill.J Hospice Palliative Nurs. 2007;9(3):159-167.

12. Thomas LPM, Meier EA, Irwin SA. Meaning-centered psychotherapy: a form of psychotherapy for patients with cancer.Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2016;16(10):488.

13. Steinhauser KE, Clipp EC, McNeilly M, et al. In search of a good death: observations of patients, families, and providers.Annals Intern Med. 2000;132(10):825-832.

14. Hedtke L. Creating stories of hope: a narrative approach to illness, death and grief.Aust N Z J Fam Ther. 2014;35(1):4-19.

15. De La Lama LB, De La Lama L. Counseling a terminally ill agnostic seeking to reclaim spirituality: a narrative approach to dying well. Available at https://www.counseling.org/resources/library/vistas/Article_103.pdf. Last accessed April 6, 2023.

16. Hospice Chaplaincy. The Impact of Narrative Therapy in End-of-Life Care. Available at https://hospicechaplaincy.com/2020/09/01/the-impact-of-narrative-therapy-in-end-of-life-care/. Last accessed April 6, 2026.

17. Psych Central. Understanding Terror Management Theory. Available at https://psychcentral.com/health/terror-management-theory. Last accessed April 6, 2026.

18. 18. Strachan E, Pyszczynski T, Greenberg J, Solomon S (eds). Coping with the inevitability of death: terror management and mismanagement. In: Snyder, CR (ed).Coping With Stress: Effective People and Processes. Oxford University Press, London: 114-136; 2001.

19. Greenberg J, Vail K, Pyszczynski T (eds). Terror management theory and research: how the desire for death transcendence drives our strivings for meaning and significance. In:Advances in Motivation Science. Academic Press: 85-134; 2014.

20. Vail KE III, Juhl J, Rutjens BT, et al. When death is good for life: considering the positive trajectories of terror management.Personality Social Psychology Rev. 2012;16(4):303-329.

21. Oltmann C, The benefits of cognitive behavioral therapy in the palliative setting. Available at https://exclusive.multibriefs.com/content/the-benefits-of-cognitive-behavioral-therapy-in-the-palliative-setting/medical-allied-healthcare. Last accessed April 6, 2026.

22. Bates AT. Addressing existential suffering.BCMJ. 2016;58(5):268-273.

23. Anderson T, Watson M, Davidson R. The use of cognitive behavioural therapy techniques for anxiety and depression in hospice patients: a feasibility study.Palliat Med. 2008;22(7):814-821.

24. Burn K, Lee L. Cognitive behavioural therapy in palliative care: evaluation of staff following a foundation level course.Int J Palliat Nurs. 2017;23(6):270-278.

25. Greer JA, Park ER, Prigerson HG, Safren SA. Tailoring cognitive-behavioral therapy to treat anxiety comorbid with advanced cancer.J Cogn Psychother. 2010;24(4):294-313.

26. Psychology Today. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy. Available at https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/therapy-types/acceptance-and-commitment-therapy. Last accessed April 6, 2026.

27. Psychology Today. Dialectical Behavior Therapy. Available at https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/therapy-types/dialectical-behavior-therapy. Last accessed April 6, 2026.

28. Bauereiß N, Obermaier S, Özünal SE, and Baumeister H. Effects of existential interventions on spiritual, psychological, and physical well-being in adult patients with cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Psychooncology. 2018;27(11):2531-2545.

29. Brietbart W, Pessin H, Rosenfeld B, et al. Meaning-centered group psychotherapy for patients with advanced cancer: a pilot randomized controlled trial.Psychooncology. 2010;19(1):21-28.

30. Breitbart W, Rosenfeld B, Pessin H. Applebaum A, Kulikowski J, Lichtenthal WG. Meaning-centered group psychotherapy: an effective intervention for improving psychological well-being in patients with advanced cancer.J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(7):749-754.

31. Rosenfeld B, Cham H, Pessin H, Breitbart W. Why is meaning-centered group psychotherapy effective? Enhanced sense of meaning as the mechanism of change for advanced cancer patients.Psychooncology. 2017;27(2):654-660.

32. Applebaum AJ, Kulikowski JR, Breitbart W. Meaning-centered psychotherapy for cancer caregivers (MCP-C): rationale and overview.Palliat Support Care. 2015;13(6):1631-1641.

33. Lichtenthal WG, Catarozoli C, Masterson M, et al. An open trial of meaning-centered grief therapy: rationale and preliminary evaluation.Palliat Support Care. 2019;17:2-12.

34. van der Spek N, Vos J, van Uden-Kraan CF, et al. Efficacy of meaning-centered group psychotherapy for cancer survivors: a randomized controlled trial.Psychol Med. 2017;47(11):1990-2001.

35. Gilbert P. The origins and nature of compassion focused therapy.Br J Clin Psychol. 2014;53(1):6-41.

36. Pfaff K, Markaki A. Compassionate collaborative care: an integrative review of quality indicators in end-of-life care.BMC Palliat Care. 2017;16(1):65.

37. Kirby JN. Compassion interventions: the programmes, the evidence, and implications for research and practice.Psychol Psychother. 2017;90(3):432-455.

38. Leaviss J, Uttley L. Psychotherapeutic benefits of compassion-focused therapy: an early systematic review.Psychological Med. 2015;45(5): 927-945.

39. Nolan S. Hope beyond (redundant) hope: how chaplains work with dying patients.Palliat Med. 2011;25(1):21-25.

40. Arbour RB, Wiegand DL. Self-described nursing roles experience during care of dying patients and their families: a phenomenological study.Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2014;30(4):211-218.

41. Ando M, Morita T, Okamoto T, Ninosaka Y. One-week short-term life review interview can improve spiritual well-being of terminally ill cancer patients.Psychooncology. 2008;17:885-890.

42. Ando M, Morita T, Akechi T, Okamoto T, Japanese Task Force for Spiritual Care. Efficacy of short-term life-review interviews on the spiritual well-being of terminally ill cancer patients.J Pain Sympt Manage. 2010;39:993-1002.

43. Nissim R, Freeman E, Lo C, et al. Managing Cancer and Living Meaningfully (CALM): a qualitative study of a brief individual psychotherapy for individuals with advanced cancer.Palliative Med. 2012;26:713-721.

44. Hales S, Lo C, Rodin G (eds).Managing Cancer and Living Meaningfully (CALM) Treatment Manual: An Individual Psychotherapy for Patients with Advanced Cancer. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: University Health Network; 2015.

45. Rodin G, Lo C, Rydall A, et al. Managing Cancer and Living Meaningfully (CALM): a randomized controlled trial of psychological intervention for patients with advanced cancer.J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(23):2422-2432.

46. Smalley SL, Winston D (eds). Fully Present:The Science, Art, and Practice of Mindfulness. Da Capo Press: Cambridge, MA; 2010.

47. Pier TJ. Integrating Mindfulness Into Palliative Care: Caring for Patients and Families. Available at https://www.scribd.com/document/951622691/PALLIATIVECARE-Mindfulness-Patients. Last accessed April 6, 2026.

48. Soroka JT, Collins LA, Creech G, Kutcher GR, Menne KR, Petzel BL. Spiritual care at the end of life: does educational intervention focused on a broad definition of spirituality increase utilization of chaplain spiritual support in hospice?J Palliat Med. 2019;22(8):939-944.

49. Richardson P. Spirituality, religion, and palliative care.Ann Palliat Med. 2014;3(3):150-159.

50. Scott K, Thiel MM, Dahlin CM. The essential elements of spirituality in end-of-life care.Chaplaincy Today. 2008;24(2):15-21.

51. Coalition for Compassionate Care of California. FICA Spiritual Assessment Tool. Available at https://coalitionccc.org/CCCC/CCCC/Resources/FICA-Spiritual-Assessment-Tool.aspx. Last accessed April 6, 2026.

52. Saguil A, Phelps K. The spiritual assessment.Am Fam Physician. 2012;86(6):546-550.

53. Srolovitz M, Borgwardt J, Burkart M, et al. Top ten tips palliative care clinicians should know about music therapy and art therapy.J Palliat Med. 2022;25(1):135-144.

54. Nan JKM, Pang KSY, Lam KKF, Szeto MML, Sin SFY, So CSC. An expressive-arts-based life-death education program for the elderly: a qualitative study.Death Stud. 2020;44(3):131-140.

55. Morrison P, Nishimoto PW, Kim JB, Medina-Dupaix C, O'Carroll Bantum E. Perceived impact of participation in a one-time expressive arts workshop.Mil Med. 2019;184(5-6):e242-e247.

56. Leleszi JP, Lewandowski JG. Pain management in end-of-life care.J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2005;105(3 Suppl 1):S6-S11.

Evidence-Based Practice Recommendations Citations

1. National Coalition for Hospice and Palliative Care.Clinical Practice Guidelines for Quality Palliative Care. 4th edition. Available at https://www.nationalcoalitionhpc.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/NCHPC-NCPGuidelines_4thED_web_FINAL.pdf. Last accessed August 17, 2026.